The micro-macro paradox has been revived. Despite broadly positive evaluations at the micro and meso-levels, recent literature has turned decidedly pessimistic with respect to the ability of foreign aid to foster economic growth. Policy implications, such as the complete cessation of aid to Africa, are being drawn on the basis of fragile evidence. This paper first assesses the aid-growth literature with a focus on recent contributions. The aid-growth literature is then framed, for the first time, in terms of the Rubin Causal Model, applied at the macroeconomic level. Our results show that aid has a positive and statistically significant causal effect on growth over the long run with point estimates at levels suggested by growth theory. We conclude that aid remains an important tool for enhancing the development prospects of poor nations.
- Publisher:
-
UNU-WIDER
- Series:
- WIDER Discussion Paper
- Volume:
- 2009/05
- Title:
- Aid and Growth: Have We Come Full Circle?
- Authors:
- Channing Arndt, Sam Jones, and Finn Tarp
- Publication date:
- October 2009
- ISBN 13 Print:
- 9789292302238
- ISBN 13 Web:
- 9789292302245
- Copyright holder:
- © UNU-WIDER
- Copyright year:
- 2009
- Keywords:
- foreign aid, growth, aid effectiveness, causal effects
- JEL:
- O1, O4, F35, C21
- Project:
-
New Directions in Development Economics
- Sponsor:
- UNU-WIDER acknowledges the financial contributions to the research programme by the governments of Denmark (Royal Ministry of Foreign Affairs), Finland (Ministry for Foreign Affairs), Sweden (Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency—Sida) and the United Kingdom (Department for International Development).
- Format:
- online and printed copies