Skip to Content

UNU-WIDER Love Thy Neighbour? Evidence from Ethnic Discrimination in Information Sharing within Villages

Support functions

A teenager wears torn rubber boots in a muddy local market in Bac Ha, Viet Nam. As of 2005 figures, half the world population—more than 3 billion people–is estimated to live on less than USD 2.50 a day. Bac Ha, Viet Nam. UN Photo/Kibae Park.

Table of contents

Love Thy Neighbour? Evidence from Ethnic Discrimination in Information Sharing within Villages

There is increasing evidence to suggest that a fundamental source of information for farmers on how to access and use new agricultural technologies comes from interacting with neighbours. Economic research on adoption of innovations in a rural context has only partially addressed the issue of how the social structure of a village can affect adoption and the final impact on productivity of farmers. This paper investigates the role of proximity interpreted not only in geographical terms but also along the line of ethnic similarities among neighbours (what we define as ‘social proximity’). We use a panel dataset collected in Côte d’Ivoire to define the probability of accessing the knowledge network. The main results indicate that farmers from ethnic minorities are less likely to access, and benefit less from, extension services. But they seem to try to re-equalize their condition by putting more effort than dominant ethnic group neighbours in sharing information among themselves.
Publisher:
UNU-WIDER
Series:
WIDER Research Paper
Volume:
2004/06
Title:
Love Thy Neighbour? Evidence from Ethnic Discrimination in Information Sharing within Villages
Authors:
Mattia Romani
Publication date:
2004
ISSN Web:
1810-2611
ISBN Web:
9291905836
ISBN 13 Web:
9789291905836
Copyright holder:
© UNU-WIDER
Copyright year:
2004
Keywords:
economic development, technological change, growth
JEL:
O1, O3, Q1
Project:
Spatial Disparities in Human Development
Sponsor:
UNU-WIDER acknowledges the financial contributions to the research programme by the governments of Denmark (Royal Ministry of Foreign Affairs), Finland (Ministry for Foreign Affairs), Norway (Royal Ministry of Foreign Affairs), Sweden (Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency-Sida) and the United Kingdom (Department for International Development).
Format:
online

^ Back to top