Skip to Content

UNU-WIDER Firm Location Choice in Cities: Evidence from China, India, and Brazil

Support functions

Publications

Table of contents

Firm Location Choice in Cities: Evidence from China, India, and Brazil

We use large survey data sets of firms provided by the World Bank for China, India, and Brazil—Investment Climate Surveys—to address the important question: what determines the locational choice of firms among cities in these countries. We find that capital cities in all countries are attractive for firms to locate. In India and China, labour-intensive firms tend not to locate in mid-sized or large cities, when compared with smaller ones, perhaps due to higher wage, training and attrition costs. Labour regulations both in India and China deter firms from locating in the larger cities, but not in Brazil. Exporter firms prefer to locate in large cities in these two countries, but not so in the largest cities of Brazil. Finally, while the size of a firm has no impact on its location decision in China, large firms in India prefer to locate in the largest cities, but not in mid-sized cities. Proximity to inputs within the city has a positive impact on firm location. The post-reform firms in China tend to locate in the large cities whereas in the case of India, post-1991 firms refrain from locating in the mid-sized or large cities. These findings have important policy implications for urban governance in these countries, which are summarized in the paper.
Publisher:
UNU-WIDER
Series:
WIDER Research Paper
Volume:
2007/56
Title:
Firm Location Choice in Cities: Evidence from China, India, and Brazil
Authors:
Kala Seetharam Sridhar and Guanghua Wan
Publication date:
September 2007
ISSN Web:
1810-2611
ISBN 13 Web:
9789292300036
Copyright holder:
© UNU-WIDER
Copyright year:
2007
Keywords:
India, China, Brazil, location choice, industry location, firm location
JEL:
P52, R3, R12, R58
Project:
Southern Engines of Global Growth
Sponsor:
UNU-WIDER acknowledges the financial contributions to the research programme by the governments of Denmark (Royal Ministry of Foreign Affairs), Finland (Ministry for Foreign Affairs), Norway (Royal Ministry of Foreign Affairs), Sweden (Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency—Sida) and the United Kingdom (Department for International Development).
Format:
online

^ Back to top