This paper examines the country specific effect of policy reform on infrastructure spending in China and India. In China we have examined how marketization and decentralization has affected the composition of provincial public expenditure and in the case of India we have examined the impact of fiscal reforms on sub-national infrastructure spending. It is observed that in China with a lower marketization level in 1986–1992, fiscal decentralization had positive effect on development expenditure and negative effect on other expenditure. However, when the marketization level increased, such effects were reversed. In the case of India, the econometric estimates revealed that, in the post-economic liberalization era, financial sector reforms and fiscal reforms have adversely affected the sub-national finances and thereby the infrastructure spending. The fiscal intervention dummy found to be negative for all the sectoral expenditure, though it was expansionary for total expenditure, implying it to be committed/non-developmental expenditure driven. Thus, to conclude, as the fiscal space has been shrinking due to reform, there is an urgent need and more so in India for corrective measures to increase the fiscal space for higher infrastructure spending.
- Publisher:
-
UNU-WIDER
- Series:
- WIDER Research Paper
- Volume:
- 2009/43
- Title:
- Economic Reforms and Infrastructure Spending: Evidence from China and India
- Authors:
- Pinaki Chakraborty and Yan Zhang
- Publication date:
- August 2009
- ISSN Web:
- 1810-2611
- ISBN 13 Web:
- 97892-92302160
- Copyright holder:
- © UNU-WIDER
- Copyright year:
- 2009
- Keywords:
- fiscal reforms; infrastructure spending; decentralization
- JEL:
- H54
- Project:
-
Southern Engines of Global Growth
- Sponsor:
- UNU-WIDER gratefully acknowledges the financial contributions to the research programme by the governments of Denmark (Royal Ministry of Foreign Affairs), Finland (Ministry for Foreign Affairs), Norway (Royal Ministry of Foreign Affairs), Sweden (Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency—Sida) and the United Kingdom (Department for International Development).
- Format:
- online