Skip to Content

UNU-WIDER How Does Vietnam's Accession to the World Trade Organization Change the Spatial Incidence of Poverty?

Support functions

Publications

Table of contents

How Does Vietnam's Accession to the World Trade Organization Change the Spatial Incidence of Poverty?

Please note that this is a large file and may take time to download.
Trade policies can promote aggregate efficiency, but the ensuing structural adjustments generally create both winners and losers. From an incomes perspective, trade liberalization can raise GDP per capita, but rates of emergence from poverty depend upon individual household characteristics of economic participation and asset holding. To fully realize the growth potential of trade, while limiting the risk of rising inequality, policies need to better account for microeconomic heterogeneity. One approach to this is the geographic targeting, which shifts resources to poor areas. This study combines an integrated microsimulation-CGE model with the small area estimation to evaluate the spatial incidence of Vietnam's accession to the WTO. Provincial-level poverty reduction after full liberalization was heterogeneous, ranging from 2.2 per cent to 14.3 per cent. Full liberalization will bene?t the poor on a national basis, but the northwestern area of Vietnam is likely to lag behind. Furthermore, poverty can be shown to increase under comparable scenarios.
Publisher:
UNU-WIDER
Series:
WIDER Research Paper
Volume:
2007/12
Title:
How Does Vietnam's Accession to the World Trade Organization Change the Spatial Incidence of Poverty?
Authors:
Tomoki Fujii and David Roland-Holst
Publication date:
March 2007
ISSN Web:
1810-2611
ISBN Web:
9291909513
ISBN 13 Web:
9789291909513
Copyright holder:
© UNU-WIDER
Copyright year:
2007
Keywords:
trade liberalization, microsimulation, computable general equilibrium, small-area estimation, Vietnam
JEL:
F13, I32, O24
Project:
Impact of Globalization on the World's Poor
Sponsor:
The governments of Denmark (Royal Ministry of Foreign Affairs), Finland (Ministry for Foreign Affairs), Norway (Royal Ministry of Foreign Affairs), Sweden (Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency-Sida) and the United Kingdom (Department for International Development).
Format:
online
 
Please note that this is a large file and may take time to download.

^ Back to top