A comparative study is undertaken that explores Chinese and Indian pharmaceutical industries under different patent regimes. It is found that relative to India, which had implemented process patent until 2005, China with a product patent regime since 1993 suffers from both lower drug accessibility and availability (the latter is a missing parameter in the literature). Also, China lags behind in both lower R&D investment and patents filed by Chinese nationals. Based on these findings and associated legal interpretation, we conclude that higher patent protection in China generates negative impacts on the pharmaceutical industries. Thus, governments should utilize TRIPS flexibilities and other regimes like price control to offset the anticompetitive effect in designing patent policies.
- Publisher:
-
UNU-WIDER
- Series:
- WIDER Research Paper
- Volume:
- 2008/36
- Title:
- The Impact of Higher Standards in Patent Protection for Pharmaceutical Industries under the TRIPS Agreement: A Comparative Study of China and India
- Authors:
- Xuan Li
- Publication date:
- April 2008
- ISSN Web:
- 1810-2611
- ISBN 13 Web:
- 9789292300821
- Copyright holder:
- © UNU-WIDER
- Copyright year:
- 2008
- Keywords:
- product patent, process patent, TRIPS, pharmaceutical industries, China, India
- JEL:
- O34, L65, F14
- Project:
-
Southern Engines of Global Growth
- Sponsor:
- The governments of Denmark (Royal Ministry of Foreign Affairs), Finland (Ministry for Foreign Affairs), Norway (Royal Ministry of Foreign Affairs), Sweden (Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency—Sida) and the United Kingdom (Department for International Development).
- Format:
- online