Blog
An unprecedented threat requires unprecedented leadership

What is needed from global powers

COVID-19 is the greatest global threat the world has faced since the Second World War. It is not the deadliest or most infectious disease recorded, but the level of globalization and interconnectedness of the world render it particularly destructive. The depth of the global economic crisis is exceptional; not only is it worse than the 2008 global recession, it is happening when there is weakened global collaboration and increasing political posturing over COVID-19. 

The world’s response was briefly but perfectly expressed in New York Governor Andrew Cuomo’s statement, 'This is an enemy that we have underestimated from day one and we have paid the price dearly'.  

Heroic sacrifices have been made by health personnel and frontline workers across the world, while the wider public, also affected by tragedy and sacrifice, has demonstrated its readiness to follow collective measures to curb COVID-19. Many local and national governments, despite the initial delay, have shown exceptional leadership in their efforts to avert disaster and to inspire the public and vulnerable members of society. 

However, the actions, or lack of them, of some leaders have spread confusion and disruption. There is no better example of the dearth of leadership than in the US. In the past, the US has provided resolute global leadership to prevent potential crises and respond to a variety of global threats. Examples can be found in the establishment of the Bretton Woods organizations and the recovery of war-torn Europe through the Marshall Plan. US administrations played a critical role in such recent events as the post-2008 economic recovery and other pandemics including SARS in Asia, MERS in the Middle East, and Ebola in West and Central Africa. For seven decades the actions and leadership role taken by the US have contributed to a better world and more effective global emergency response mechanisms. 

Yet at a time when the world is looking for direction, advanced economies and great powers should not abdicate their global leadership role. They should restrain from resorting to posturing internationally and putting out conflicting messaging on the deadly nature of the virus, and they should pursue actions that are based on the evidence and the best available scientific advice. The G20 countries should provide total support to the WHOs, as France and Germany have exemplified. 

Three pillars

It is time to learn lessons from the ineffective global response to COVID-19. Time to provide exceptional leadership and build a global coalition to end the unprecedented threat and work together beyond it. With over 2.5 million confirmed cases globally and 150,000 deaths in the past four months, we are not yet seeing  the light at the end of the tunnel. 

It is possible that COVID-19 will recur in a series of waves until a vaccine is created, tested, and administered to the wider world. In this dire situation, global collaboration should focus on the three pillars outlined below. As the IMF’s managing director Kristalina Georgieva put it, this is an unprecedented global threat and an unprecedented global threat requires bold, far-sighted, and exceptional leadership. 

Diverse strategies and responses and learning 

It is important that each government’s response to COVID-19 reflects its specific conditions — as issues such as demography, residential patterns, health care systems, economic conditions, and political/governance systems differ between countries. The guiding principle for countries should be unswerving commitment to  the COVID-19 response as the country’s top priority, together with a bold and comprehensive approach that includes adequate communications and public awareness, plus decision-making based on established facts and scientific advice. 

A comprehensive approach implies that emergency health measures and considerations of economic support are not mutually exclusive. It also means maximum cooperation by all levels and agencies of government, and especially coordination with the WHO, other international organizations, and other countries. Amidst the threat created by COVID-19, supporting the WHO should not become a divisive political act

The politicization of the WHO should be halted and global collaboration harnessed instead. As the risks and uncertainties evolve, constant sharing of experiences and rapid learning from our own and other countries’ actions is vital. 

Scientific collaboration 

The COVID-19 pandemic is primarily a health issue in which scientific advancement and research breakthroughs play a central role. Development of new, affordable, and effective vaccines and treatments are key priorities. Smart technological breakthroughs and tracing and tracking systems are critical, as are technologies that improve analytical and decision-making processes. The research and development that underpins scientific advance requires international collaboration between the private sector, the scientific community and research universities, and governments. 

Advanced and emerging economies can play a leading role; philanthropic health care organizations can prove indispensable. Scientific breakthroughs should be focused on the identification, prevention and protection, and cure of such pandemics. These endeavours should also address climate change, a great contributor to widespread health threats. 

International alliance to assist developing countries

As the various measures taken in Europe and the US start to see a flattening of the curve, the next frontier — and the most vulnerable — will be developing countries, because of their low levels of economic resilience, innovation advancement and knowledge, health care systems, resource bases, and social fabric. However, a global threat like COVID-19 leaves no population or geographic area untouched. Support for developing economies must be part of international cooperation. 

The 2020 G-20 Summit failed to recognize COVID-19 as an unprecedented global threat and ended without any significant decisions on the global economic crisis and health emergency. International organizations such as the IMF and the World Bank Group should be commended for voicing their concerns and calling for international emergency support, economic stimuli, and partial debt relief. 

The traditional powers, such as the US,  the G7, the G-20, and the emerging powers  should forge a united front and spearhead an international alliance with developing nations to defeat this global threat. An unprecedented global threat deserves unprecedented leadership; and ultimately effective leadership will shape the future of humanity.
 

The views expressed in this piece are those of the author(s), and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Institute or the United Nations University, nor the programme/project donors.


 

Previous
International tax avoidance and development
International tax avoidance and development
Next
35 years of knowledge for change (1985-95)
UNU-WIDER was among the first to challenge IMF orthodoxy on macroeconomic stabilization...
35 years of knowledge for change (1985-95)